The following is a dialogue with net friend, dialogue is the core content of the state-owned enterprises whether it should be privatised, problem origin YuShiHang President zoellick research report published "the China of 2030", thus leading to conflict and discussed. The following is the content of the original version of the original work properly after editing. This paper just to China's economic and social problems for how to solve the theoretical discussion, no political color, so please friends in the message of attention is correct, the wording. The article the author welcome more wise men involved in China's reform and the construction of big discussion, on a "male" people's responsibility. Stranger a 15:24:15 hello, in? To show you a video http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMzU3OTk3OTA0.html enhanced desert 15:25:44 hello, thank you for providing information, this I have also seen, too simple, sometimes naive man a 15:25:59 net the truth the desert 15:26:11 was not all is, things may not be so simple a passer-by 15:26:15 feel he has propped up on the sasac, I do wonder, really don't know how to change the 15:27:17 vividly what zha to man a 15:27:42 state-owned Banks privatization should it be? The desert 15:27:50 your problem is very interesting, but it is a false statement. Stranger a 15:28:05 how is a false statement? I feel, that man is a anger green, but very patriotic enhanced desert 15:28:14 it's not all anger green, do not eliminate is a pawn. Patriotic far from, it is essential to patriotic people, is to maintain this piece of JiangShanYong solid and peace, not an abstract, love what "socialist". You of the proposition "false" lies in the thinking mode, namely the public or private binary. And that state-owned enterprises in China, country is "private", and "public". And the only national business profits for all the people's livelihood, return to people, this as the management of the main body of the "national" is the "public". If the profit distribution ignored, so no essential difference between the nationalization and privatization. Stranger a 15:28:26 why no difference 15:28:28 desert sands said last name countries last name "China" should not private discussion of problems,new era hats wholesale we is under the flag of socialist country, should adhere to the state-owned economy in the country of the lifeline controlling proportion. But China's real problem is not the, the key is to make profit is public, is used for the people's livelihood stranger a 15:28:34 well enhanced desert 15:28:37 who business, not? "Management" the right not important, the key is in the profit distribution mode and financial public. If you are willing to work, the money to spend us, so we are not against your "work" (business) right stranger a 15:28:59 but then again, though more efficient than nationalization privatization, but distribution system may be more than nationalization darkness, and how to control the profit distribution and financial problems? 15:29:13 desert you say the concern is right. National business than one advantage of privatization, and the operation profit is controllable. Free disposal this part of the profits. If it is used for the people's livelihood education, medical treatment, such as defense, retirement is the justice, or is not justice. Now the distribution of the profits of the current situation is not justice, because a few of the interest group became a "private", and the people's livelihood several no relationship. If all state-owned enterprises scholars from renmin profit public, financial public, 90% of the profits to extract the pension and social security funds do education funds, not have to. The desert 15:29:35 what are solved, and can control the economy keeps socialism, and the benefit of its people. The bank's President of the so-called privatization thinking is also not done, because in China privatize, actually stale became "devour" state-owned assets examples can be found everywhere. And after privatization, not only profit controlled, and "rich" people go abroad for all the basic run. Stranger a 15:29:45 so, here or a decentralization question, is it the desert 15:29:56 so the question is not in your last name, and in how to do it. Don't just decentralization, is put in the YuMinZhengLi less, and the state-owned enterprise had won 9 into profits should be returned in the people, used for education and public welfare. Stranger a 15:30:02 well enhanced desert 15:30:03 comrade deng xiaoping raised this question about early, surname club name information are not problems, last name and private or last name now? !What is socialism, this is not important. The key to the people who look good, see how to do a passer-by 15:30:31 current situation is, state-owned enterprises with all the money though do things, but no dividends to taxpayers 15:32:01 desert? Yes, there is also the private vomit abuse phenomenon, oil is not in bulk to buy a house? And sinopec sichuan company also has a negative rumours, they use the money to the people in profit, but just don't know this "and" use the stranger a 15:32:17 where the system reform, seem to be white pull. Reform, other people eat ah the desert 15:32:18 that's the problem. Not in the so-called "independent scholars" little brother care about whether the family name club. China issued "matter right law", and talk about what qualifications surname "club"? Peking University professor 巩献 year when Mr In socialist for name on the introduction of the property law against you, then the law or not be smoothly through the? !In fact, "property rights", it is the privatisation of things well, slaves and feudal society is people and things are well privatization. Capitalism is the content of the privatisation and tools, well, is that the man is the socialist complete liberation and the matter big rich and big communist?Stranger a 15:32:25 so say, as if the problem is involved, the face also big desert 15:32:35 yeah, so somebody else the bank's President said ah, the key in our China's leaders, he may words without the lines it stranger a 15:32:52 well enhanced desert 15:32:56 whether his meaning is what, at least a little bit is worthy of affirmation, and that is benefiting people have vested interest groups, or to China's economic and social next go really difficult, because this continues, with house prices, as a representative of the asset price bubbles too serious, China polarization between the rich and the too big lead to domestic demand rev. Still, countries do not change the weak qiangming economy structure can't get reverse stranger a 15:33:27 but now state-owned Banks, if privatisation, it may be hard to and foreign Banks o competition. Because they after long-term accumulation, and have strong congenital advantage! He says it, feel much. All is the whole of the problem. But, on the other hand, the bank's President also not is what good things. In fact the world bank President also is to have the position. Encourage competition and privatization of foreign capital harmless,wholesale nfl jerseys they can continue to steal to eat on the ground in China with the hornets. The desert 15:41:05 what you said is right. The bank of course has its dark political position, but his proposal fall is the point, at least have some problems or relevant point, as for China to do, the family also said very clearly, that is "Chinese leaders". "Foreigners" the identity politics and we have what relation, we do their own things, do the right thing, made to help the people, will do bai. The desert 15:41:27 we don't give them the chance to destruction and evil will do well, comprador and the very few traitors will do a passer-by 15:41:50 hey hey, rob woman and by foreign state-owned enterprises boss rob woman, but the desert 15:42:42 what bad flavour well, ah, and change the subject. Resources are to be used, the key is how to use, who use. Lincoln American of the "three people theory" worth watching. One who was not told, had not too well in qing dynasty, the qing government to han Chinese, is actually "foreigners" rule. Of course, this is a political position of the problem, the "international socialist" position not advisable. But the proof of the history a little, at least not start rule one of the worst period of Chinese history. After all, they also live well over hundreds of years. Stranger a 15:42:57 now society, or semi-colonial and semi-feudal society is not? The desert 15:43:26 not yes, some say that capital primary stage of socialism is free capitalism, is the comprador capitalism and monopoly capitalism of the union. But we formal education should answer this answer: we are the Chinese characteristic socialism stranger a 15:43:44 terure! The desert 15:43:56 2012, hurting a lot of a lot of things, as long as don't face the real problems and, as long as HuiJiJiYi again so, as long as don't take some political will, then zoellick concern for good reason. Let us bless it together, for national peace, bless the people rich and powerful. see more:The debt crisis affect China to export Chinese believe the drop 29 countries reference rating
The United States will pay tax deferred tax cuts passed by the senate bill two months